BMS 8N515 PDF

Love
admin

drawing & mounting du cone driver BMS BMS 8N (8Ohm) spl vs frequency measurement du cone driver BMS BMS 8N (8Ohm) spl vs impedance. 96 dB Sensitivity 1 W / 1 m W Power Handling Extremely light Weight of kg 2″ Aluminium Sandwich Voice Coil for low Power Compression Double. Ciare FXI MR 8Ω. ” Mid-range. Fs, Hz. Power RMS, W, Qts, Sensitivity, 97 dB, Vas, litres. Freq-range, 90 – Hz, Xmax, mm.

Author: Arashilmaran Kagazuru
Country: Oman
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 28 January 2010
Pages: 230
PDF File Size: 8.9 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.99 Mb
ISBN: 183-6-46388-484-7
Downloads: 61888
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulugrel

BMS 8N – 8″ Bass Midrange Loudspeaker W 8 Ohms from BMS £

Most linear FR, Lower Fs, Higher Xmax, More power handling Do neodymium magnets not in general have smaller voicecoil gaps and therefore lower distortion factors, than with a larger more resonant gap? And how about getting all 3 and testing them, then keep the one you like most? Its a part of a larger 4-way application in which so far theoreticly the low end is handled by 4×12″ I know what 2 x the above mentions 8″ jobbies mentioned will do and a pair of them will work very well with the bass drivers to allow a hz ish X-over to the bass.

Don’t test the champignon sound. O That is because they are often used solely with a 15″ bass driver.

I would then cross the around hz. I agree that 8n15 is capable of more but look at the loads of folks that use them for home hi-fi, hundreds in the States: This page was generated in 0. The question was put mainly to get a grasp on what the topic states too, the reasoning for choosing drivers compared to the data presented without having actually heard it If you go back to the original thread you will see that the OP wanted Hi-Fi sound.

  ERGASTIC SUBSTANCES IN PLANT CELL PDF

BMS 8N515 – 8″ Neodym Low Midrange Lautsprecher 200W 16 Ohm

Edited by CMS – 25 November at Do neodymium magnets not in general have smaller voicecoil gaps and therefore lower distortion factors, than bbms a larger more resonant gap? To that end I suggested he used a particular Bass driver which I then could see he had already considered.

OP use the 8S Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

With all this in mind, disregarding prices which obviously makes the 8S desirable is the slightly higher moving mass and the slightly lower sens in the 8N that unwanted, as to make the 8N better despite the immediate visual inferiority?

Thank you for your input tho. I did notice the differences in distortion’s however is that what might wheigh heavy on the choice?

  CALCULO CON GEOMETRIA ANALITICA LEITHOLD PDF

BMS 8″ Driver

Hey yall, dunno if im placing this in the wrong section as im fairly “unadvanced”: You need to be using something bigger I’d 8m515 12 or 15 before its paying its way.

I’ve been looking at a pair of 8″ drivers to sit below the Bma Nd For the purpose of this question i’l restrict the drivers layed out to: D just two thoughts: You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Maybe i should have added that this does not present the whole system If anyone could possibly help me, id much appreciate it: None the less, il give bns a go.

From what i can see and with my 88n515 capability interpret by the data, my reasoning would tell me that the 8N has all the pro’s and no con’s going for it.